Monday 28 December 2015

FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE




                                                                                                                             28th Dec. 2015

Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) is a highly infectious disease caused by a virus in the genus Aphthovirus, family Picornaviridae. There are seven serotypes of FMD virus (FMDV) namely O, A, C, SAT1, SAT2, SAT3 and Asia1 that affects cloven-hoofed animals and causes disease in important domestic livestock species including; cattle, pigs, Goats and sheep and wild bovids.  In the Greater Horn of Africa region, all the listed strains are present except Asia 1 though serotype C is now less frequent and was last reported in Kenya in the year 2004. Infection with any one serotype does not confer immunity against another and in essence the serotype and their many sub-serotypes are like different FMD diseases in the region. FMD is considered a Transboundary Animal Disease (TAD) with threat to trade of live animals and their products, and is also considered a livestock production disease because of its negative impact on meat and milk production. 


Close contact of livestock in watering points and in limited pastures during drought periods.
Unregulated trade, livestock movement and proximity between open endemic and closed systems of livestock management
Breed and immunological status: Severity of FMD outbreaks varies with breeds and immunological status of the susceptible population. Improved breeds and exotic breeds show more severe disease compared with local breeds.
Presence of a naive livestock population: Infection of isolated naive populations is usually more severe when compared to endemic populations.
Closed and open management systems: Endemicity is supported by open systems and frequent livestock movements and mixing of different herds as seen in pastoral areas. Closed systems, like in the dairy systems may give rise to epidemic situations of FMD when biosecurity is breached.



Different susceptible species have different epidemiological roles in the maintenance, transmission and spread of FMD. Domestic pigs, wild pigs and warthogs act as amplifier hosts, while the African buffalo can maintain sub-clinical infection with low intermittent viral excretion and act as a reservoir for the SAT viruses. The disease is spread by infected animals through aerosols, contact with contaminated farm equipment, vehicles, clothing or feed, and by domestic and wild predators. Animal movement and wildlife reservoirs are important for transmission of FMD in the region.


FMD should be  suspected in cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and other cloven-hoofed animals if any one or more of the following clinical signs are encountered: Fever (40oC); unruptured vesicles; blisters and sores in the mouth, tongue, teats and feet at the coronary band and interdigital space; lameness, salivation, discharges from the nose and the mouth.


Field diagnosis of FMD in cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and other cloven-hoofed animals is based on the main clinical signs which include: Vesicles, blisters and sores in the mouth, interdigital space and coronary band in the feet; Salivation; and Sudden death in young animals. Laboratory diagnosis is based on serological tests (Virus Neutralization, competitive ELISA) and virus isolation, detection and nucleic acid recognition methods (Sandwich ELISA, RT-PCR).


There is no specific treatment for FMD, but supportive care may be allowed in FMD endemic areas. FMD out- breaks are typically combated through a combined strategy of mass vaccination and animal culling. Livestock movement restriction from outside the ecosystem is important in reducing incursion of new serotypes and sub-serotypes. Ring vaccination within 10 km radius should be applied around outbreak areas starting from clean areas inward during outbreaks. Vaccination should not be done in infected farms.
Containment of FMD will demand considerable efforts in movement restrictions, including quarantine and vaccination. And FMD being endemic throughout the Greater Horn of Africa, regional coordination is essential for its improved control.

Dr. Moses Bwana
Post-grad at the University of Nairobi [Applied Microbiology]
Cell: +254729246187; Email: bwanamoses@gmail.com

Thursday 24 December 2015

MIDDLE EAST RESPIRATORY SYNDROME




MIDDLE EAST RESPIRATORY SYNDROME

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a severe respiratory infection in humans mainly originating in the Middle East. It is caused by a novel lineage C betacoronavirus called the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). As of 23 September 2015, MERS-CoV has caused 1570 infection cases and 555 deaths in over 20 countries worldwide, with a high case-fatality of more than 30 %.


MERS-CoV is enzootic in Dromedary Camels (DC) across the Arabian Peninsula and in parts of Africa, causing mild upper respiratory tract illness in its camel reservoir and sporadic, but relatively rare human infections. Precisely how virus transmits to humans remains unknown but close and lengthy exposure appears to be a requirement. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) is the focal point of origin of MERS. Most human cases of MERS have been linked to lapses in infection prevention and control (IPC) in healthcare settings, with approximately 20 % of all virus detections reported among healthcare workers (HCWs) and higher exposures in those with occupations that bring them into close contact with camels. Seasonal introduction of virus to the human population via infected Dromedary Camels occurs in the camel calving season in the winter months and this may be a time when there is increased risk to humans of spill-over due to new infections among naïve DC populations. Juvenile Dromedary Camels appear to host active infection more often than adult Camels.
The continuing MERS epidemic in the Middle East is believed to be related to the failure to control the zoonotic sources, most probably the dromedary camels, which results in ongoing camel-to-human transmission. The largest healthcare-associated outbreak occurred in the Republic of Korea in 2015, in which 186 cases including 36 deaths occurred after the index patient returned from the Middle East. The high case-fatality rate of MERS and the capability of MERS-CoV to cause outbreaks in healthcare facilities pose significant threat to public health worldwide.


Droplet spread between humans is considered the mechanism of human-to-human transmission and the need for droplet precautions was emphasized after the Al- Ahsa hospital, the KSA and the South Korean outbreaks. Aerosol-generating events involving Dromedary Camels (urination, defecation, and preparation and consumption of Camel products) also increase the risk of transmission and spread. House- hold human-to human transmission occurs but is limited. Educational programs will be essential tools for combating the spread of MERS-CoV both within urban and regional communities and for the health care setting.


 The primary infection site of MERS is human respiratory tract. It has been demonstrated that MERS-CoV can effectively infect and robustly replicate in the human airway epithelium. MERS-CoV infects non-ciliated bronchial epithelial cells, bronchiolar epithelial cells, alveolar epithelial cells and endothelial cells of pulmonary vessels. Upon MERS-CoV infection in ex vivo lung tissues, the uninfected cells undergo massive apoptosis. The effective infection results in robust viral propagation and massive induction of apoptosis. These observations provide a pathological basis of the major pulmonary features of MERS i.e., pneumonia and acute lung injury. The fact that endothelial cells of blood vessel in human ex vivo lung tissues are permissive to MERS-CoV may provide a pathological basis of the potential for virus dissemination hence extrapulmonary organs involvement. Collectively, MERS-CoV may have evolved multiple antagonistic mechanisms to dampen or attenuate the host defense, which has contributed to the high pathogenicity in humans.


Unlike most other human-pathogenic coronaviruses, which mainly cause self-limiting upper respiratory tract infections, MERS-CoV is capable of causing severe disease with lower respiratory tract involvement and extrapulmonary manifestations. The mean incubation period for MERS is five to six days, ranging from two to 16 days, with 13 to 14 days between when illness begins in one person and subsequently spreads to another. Patients with severe MERS often present with pneumonic symptoms including fever, cough and dyspnoea, with some progressing to respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiorgan failure and death in 20 % to 40 % of those infected. Older males most obviously suffer severe disease and MERS patients often have co morbidities. Among those with progressive illness, the median time to death is 11 to 13 days, ranging from five to 27 days. Extrapulmonary manifestations such as renal failure, hepatic dysfunction and diarrhea have been reported. MERS bears some resemblance to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in terms of clinical manifestation.

Diagnosis

 Real Time reverse transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-rtPCR) assays as well as virus culture in Vero and LLC- MK2 cells have been employed in the diagnosis of MERS-CoV. However, cell culture is a slow, specialized and insensitive method while PCR-based techniques are the preferred method for MERS-CoV detection.
Detection of MERS-CoV antigen using a monoclonal antibody-based capture ELISA targeting the MERS-CoV nucleocapsid protein may also be done.
Serological assays for Dromedary Camel sero-surveys can be transferred to human screening with minimal re-configuration. A number of commercial ELISA kits, immunofluorescent assays (IFA) kits, recombinant proteins and monoclonal antibodies have been developed for use.


There is no specific antiviral treatment recommended for MERS-CoV infection. Individuals with MERS can seek medical care to help relieve symptoms. For severe cases, current treatment includes care to support vital organ functions.


Currently, there is no vaccine to prevent MERS-CoV infection. CDC routinely advises that people help protect themselves from respiratory illnesses by taking everyday preventive actions: Wash your hands often with soap and water for 20 seconds, and help young children do the same. Cover your nose and mouth with a tissue when you cough or sneeze, then throw the tissue in the trash. Avoid touching your eyes, nose and mouth with unwashed hands. Avoid personal contact, such as kissing, or sharing cups or eating utensils, with sick people. Clean and disinfect frequently touched surfaces and objects, such as doorknobs.
       
Dr. Moses Bwana
Post-grad at the University of Nairobi [Applied Microbiology]
Cell: +254729246187; Email: bwanamoses@gmail.com

BATS AND CAMELS: THE EMERGENCE OF ZOONOTIC CORONAVIRUSES





BATS AND CAMELS: THE EMERGENCE OF ZOONOTIC CORONAVIRUSES

In the past decade, numerous novel coronaviruses have been discovered in a wide variety of bat species and in Camels throughout Asia, Europe, Africa and America. Within the coronavirus genera Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus, which mainly infect mammals, 7 out of the 15 currently assigned viral species have only been found in bats. Bats have been proposed as one of the major hosts for alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruses and play an important role as the gene source in the evolution of these two corona- virus genera. The coronaviruses harbored by bats have been found to be associated with two high profile human disease outbreaks, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).


SARS first emerged in late 2002 in Guangdong Province, southern China, as a novel clinical severe disease (termed “atypical pneumonia”) marked by fever, head- ache and subsequent onset of respiratory symptoms including cough, dyspnoea and pneumonia. It is highly transmissible among humans and by July 2003, it had caused 8096 confirmed cases of infection in 29 countries, 774 (9.6 %) of which were fatal. The second outbreak in 2004 only caused 4 infections with no mortality nor further transmission.
The MERS epidemic emerged in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) in June 2012. It has a similar clinical syndrome to SARS but seemingly less transmissible among humans. In addition to respiratory illness, renal failure has also been identified in some severe cases of MERS. Most human cases of MERS have occurred in clusters and have been limited to countries in the Middle East. Limited cases have been reported in African and European countries and the United States of America, but exclusively in individuals traveling back from the Middle East. Some patients may have a history of contact with camels.
 The most recent MERS pandemic in the Republic of Korea in 2015 was caused by a single person who returned from travel in the Middle East. It was the second largest MERS epidemic with a total of 185 confirmed cases and 36 deaths]. By 18 August 2015 a total of 1413 laboratory-confirmed cases of MERS have been reported worldwide with a median age of 50 years, including 502 related deaths. The mortality of MERS (approximately 35 %) is much higher than that of SARS (around 10 %).

Taxonomic Classification

SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV represent two novel distinct coronavirus species in the genus Betacoronavirus. Members of betacoronavirus are separated into four lineages, A, B, C and D. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV are clustered in lineage B and C, respectively


 Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is the functional receptor of SARS-CoV and it binds using the SARS-CoV S protein. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4, also known as CD26) is the functional receptor for MERS-CoV and it is relatively conserved among mammalian species. MERS-CoV can therefore infect and replicate in most cell lines derived from human, non-human primate, bat, swine, goat, horse, rabbit, civet, and camel, but not from mice, hamster, dog, ferret, and cat. DPP4 from camel, goat, cow and sheep can be also recognized by MERS-CoV and can support MERS-CoV replication.


Civets are the intermediate and transmission host of SARS-CoV. Molecular detection and virus isolation studies have suggested that the pandemic-causing SARS-CoV (2003/2004) originated from traded civets in wet markets.
 Before the outbreak of SARS, two other zoonotic viruses, Nipah virus and Hendra virus, emerged in Asia and Australia and were both known to be originated from bats. These led scientists to consider bats in the search of reservoirs of SARS-CoV.
In 2005, the discovery of novel coronaviruses related to SARS-CoV in Horseshoe Bats (genus Rhinolophus) was reported in China, and they were termed SARS-like coronavirus (SL-CoV). SL-CoVs were also discovered in rhinolophids from Slovenia, Bulgaria and Italy in Europe. The European SL-CoVs exhibited significant genetic variation from Chinese isolates. In Africa, novel betacoronaviruses related to SARS-CoV have been detected in Hipposideros and Chaerophon species from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. These African viruses of non-rhinolophid origin are phylogenetically distant to SARS-CoV.
The theory of bat origin of SARS-CoV lacked a powerful support due to the failure of direct isolation of SL-CoV from bats, despite numerous trials. The isolation of a bat SL- CoV genetically closely resembling SARS-CoV and having a functional S protein capable of using the same ACE2 receptor as SARS-CoV provided robust and conclusive evidence for the bat origin of SARS-CoV. This also suggests a possible origin of SARS-CoV from recombination of different SL-CoVs.


 Most early MERS cases had contact history with animals, e.g., dromedary camels. MERS-CoV RNA was detected in camels from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Egypt and showed high similarities (>99 %) to human MERS-CoV in genomic sequences. Serological evidence further confirmed a high prevalence of MERS-CoV infections in camels in the Middle East, Africa and Europe (Spain). These results strongly suggest that MERS-CoV infection in humans were transmitted through close contact with infected camels. By genomic analysis of lineage C betacoronaviruses, MERS-CoV derived from camels show high similarities to human MERS-CoV with >99.5 % nt identities, confirming that the human and camel isolates belong to the same coronavirus species.

Bat viruses related to MERS-CoV

Based on genomic sequence analysis, bat coronaviruses have been grouped into lineage C of the genus Betacoronavirus. After the outbreak of MERS, MERS-CoV related coronaviruses were found in more bat species and countries. Among these viruses, full-length or near full-length genomes of BtCoV-HKU4, BtCoV-HKU5, SC2013 and NeoCoV have been characterized. The bat NeoCoV shares 85.6 % nt identities with MERS-CoV at genomic level and it can be classified as the same MERS-CoV species. The most recent ancestor analysis speculated that MERS-CoV may have jumped from bats to camels approximately 20 years ago in Africa, with camels then being imported into the Arabian Peninsula. NeoCoV is closer to MERS-CoV than other bat coronaviruses at genomic level. MERS-CoV has evolved to adapt to use human receptor and the DPP4-recognizing bat coronaviruses like HKU4 may follow up, thereby posing a serious risk to human health.

Comparison of Transmission of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV

 Both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV are emerging zoonotic pathogens that have crossed the species barriers to infect humans. Bats are the origin and natural reservoirs of both SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV are then transmitted to humans via an intermediate host mainly civets and camels, respectively.

Control and Prevention of SARS-CoV

 Human SARS-CoV infection originated from the direct contact between humans and civets in markets or restaurants. Closing wet markets and cleaning civet cut off the spread chain of SARS-CoV and effectively ended the SARS epidemic.


 In contrast, MERS-CoV is believed to have existed in camels for a very long time and camels are widely distributed in Middle East and African countries, serving as important transport vectors and sources of meat and milk for the local population. A comprehensive control and prevention approach involving the effective vaccination of camels against MERS-CoV among other measures will be important in prevention of future outbreaks.


 HCoV-229E was found in the 1960s and causes comparatively mild common colds worldwide. A bat coronavirus detected in Hipposideros cafferruber in Ghana is genetically related to HCoV-229E and were predicted to share a most recent common ancestor (MRCA) only 200 years ago. These hipposiderid bat coronaviruses are more diversified and form a single viral species with HCoV- 229E. Interestingly, phylogenetic analysis revealed the intermediate position of a 229E-related alpaca virus between bat and human viruses. These findings suggested the ancestral origin of HCoV-229E in hipposiderid bats and the role of camelids as potential intermediate hosts. HCoV-NL63 was first isolated from babies suffering of pneumonia and bronchiolitis in 2004.
 In 2010, a bat coronavirus termed ARCoV.2 (Appalachian Ridge CoV) detected in North American tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus) in the US showed close relationship with HCoV-NL63.  Further analysis indicated that HCoV-NL63 can replicate in cell lines derived from the lungs of tricolored bats. These results suggest that prototypes of HCoV- NL63 may also exist in bats and there may also be a bat origin of this human coronavirus.

Dr. Moses Bwana
Post-grad at the University of Nairobi [Applied Microbiology]
Cell: +254729246187; Email: bwanamoses@gmail.com


Wednesday 23 December 2015

CANINE DISTEMPER




CANINE DISTEMPER
Canine distemper is a highly contagious and serious viral illness of dogs with no known cure. The disease has a worldwide distribution and is often fatal. The disease affects dogs, and certain species of wildlife, such as raccoons, wolves, foxes and skunks. The common house pet, the ferret, is also a carrier of this virus. It is caused by the Canine distemper virus (CDV) which is similar to the measles virus, and is a member of the genus Morbillivirus within the family Paramyxoviridae. Canine distemper virus is an enveloped negative- sense, single-stranded RNA virus that produces a multi- systemic disease and results in immunosuppression in the host. The disease is sometimes called “hard pad disease” because certain strains of the virus can cause an abnormal enlargement or thickening of the pads of an animal’s feet.

Risk Factors
Presence of Dogs with incomplete vaccination or no vaccination
Young, unvaccinated puppies and non-immunized older dogs tend to be more susceptible to the disease.

Transmission and Spread
Canine distemper virus is spread most frequently by direct contact with respiratory tract secretions from an infected dog or wildlife. Other potential sources of infection include contact with infected body tissues and secretions such as urine. Pregnant dogs that contract the virus can infect their unborn puppies.  The virus initially attacks a dog’s tonsils and lymph nodes and replicates there for about one week. It then attacks the respiratory, urogenital, gastrointestinal, and nervous systems.

Clinical Presentation
CD is a multisystemic disease that can present with one or more of the following: In the initial stages; high fever (≥39.7° C), reddened eyes, and a watery discharge from the nose and eyes. An infected dog will become lethargic and tired, and will usually become anorexic. Persistent coughing, vomiting, and diarrhoea may also occur. The respiratory signs may be complicated by secondary bacterial infection (purulent nasal discharge, coughing, dyspnoea, pneumonia). In the later stages of the disease, the virus starts attacking the other systems of the dog’s body, particularly the nervous system. The brain and spinal cord are affected and the dog may start having fits, seizures, paralysis, and attacks of hysteria. This may result in death 2-5 weeks after initial infection.

Diagnosis
 Canine distemper is diagnosed with biochemical tests and urine analysis, which may also reveal a reduced number of lymphocytes in the initial stages of the disease (lymphopenia). A serology test may identify positive antibodies, but this test cannot distinguish between vaccination antibodies and an exposure to a virulent virus. Viral antigens may be detected in urine sediment or vaginal imprints. Haired skin, nasal mucous, and the footpad epithelium may be tested for antibodies as well. Radiographs can only be used to determine whether an infected animal has contracted pneumonia. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can be used to examine the brain for any lesions that may have developed.

Treatment
Unfortunately, there is no cure for Canine Distemper. Treatment for the disease, therefore, is heavily focused on alleviating the symptoms. If the animal has become anorexic or has diarrhoea, intravenous supportive fluids may be given. Discharge from the eyes and nose must be cleaned away regularly. Antibiotics may be prescribed to control the symptoms caused by a secondary bacterial infection, and Phenobarbitals and Potassium Bromide may be needed to control convulsions and seizures. There are no antiviral drugs that are effective in treating the disease.

Prognosis
The prospect of survival depends on the dog’s immune system and its individual ability to kill the virus. Generally, 50 percent of dogs that contract the virus will develop the clinical signs and symptoms associated with distemper, but the illness can range from mild clinical signs to death. Death may occur from one or two weeks to three months following infection with the virus. Once an animal develops neurological symptoms of the disease, such as seizures or paralysis, its chances of surviving are slim and its quality of life is bound to become progressively worse. Thus, these animals are usually “put to sleep,” or euthanized, in order to ensure a humane death.

Prevention
Vaccination with the DHLP vaccine is an excellent preventive measure as it provides a prolonged immunity in a high percentage of dogs that receive the vaccine at 9-16 weeks of age. Canine distemper is therefore a vaccine preventable disease.
Keep puppies that have not had all their vaccinations away from unvaccinated and wild animals. The use of appropriate disinfectants such as Quaternary ammonium disinfectants is effective in killing the canine distemper virus in kennels, hospitals, or other potentially infected areas. Sanitation is very important in preventing the spread of any infectious disease. The owner should consult with a veterinarian about the best vaccination schedule for an individual dog.

Dr. Moses Bwana
Post-grad at the University of Nairobi [Applied Microbiology]